• Monaco 2025 - mixed feelings ?

    From Geoff@geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tuesday, May 27, 2025 11:46:26
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    Many blamed the 'compulsory 2-stop' rule for disadvantaging cars/teams
    stuck behind others doing their own strategies.

    The answer - overtake them, just as you would have to in order to gain a
    place without the new rule !

    Yes, not easy at Monaco. but never has been whatever the regs.
    --
    geoff

    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Monday, May 26, 2025 17:02:52
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 2025-05-26 16:46, Geoff wrote:
    Many blamed the 'compulsory 2-stop' rule for disadvantaging cars/teams
    stuck behind others doing their own strategies.

    The answer - overtake them, just as you would have to in order to gain a place without the new rule !

    Yes, not easy at Monaco. but never has been whatever the regs.


    Meh.

    I'm glad they tried something new to spice up a race that has been a procession for decades.

    Did it work? No, not really.
    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From Yazoo@yazoo@myself.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tuesday, May 27, 2025 10:57:35
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On Mon, 26 May 2025 17:02:52 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-05-26 16:46, Geoff wrote:
    Many blamed the 'compulsory 2-stop' rule for disadvantaging cars/teams
    stuck behind others doing their own strategies.

    The answer - overtake them, just as you would have to in order to gain a
    place without the new rule !

    Yes, not easy at Monaco. but never has been whatever the regs.


    Meh.

    I'm glad they tried something new to spice up a race that has been a >procession for decades.

    Did it work? No, not really.

    Yeah, mixed feelings.
    Monaco has historical status as "the" race.
    But actual racing has been almost impossible for years now. Cars are
    too big for this narrow streets.
    And nothing can solve this problem.

    Did you see the old car alongside the new one? The old one looks like
    a toy compared to the new one. Current cars are huge, too big for
    these streets of Monaco.
    --
    It's better to be judged by twelwe than carried by six.
    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From a425couple@a425couple@hotmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tuesday, May 27, 2025 08:36:41
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 5/27/25 01:57, Yazoo wrote:
    On Mon, 26 May 2025 17:02:52 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-05-26 16:46, Geoff wrote:
    Many blamed the 'compulsory 2-stop' rule for disadvantaging cars/teams
    stuck behind others doing their own strategies.

    The answer - overtake them, just as you would have to in order to gain a >>> place without the new rule !

    Yes, not easy at Monaco. but never has been whatever the regs.


    Meh.

    I'm glad they tried something new to spice up a race that has been a
    procession for decades.

    Did it work? No, not really.

    Yeah, mixed feelings.
    Monaco has historical status as "the" race.
    But actual racing has been almost impossible for years now. Cars are
    too big for this narrow streets.
    And nothing can solve this problem.

    Did you see the old car alongside the new one? The old one looks like
    a toy compared to the new one. Current cars are huge, too big for
    these streets of Monaco.

    I agree with the great problems created by modern cars huge size.

    In this article Alexander Wurz discusses 3 feasible solutions.
    (He certainly knows the subject!)

    citation - go to it, to view pictures. https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/three-feasible-ways-to-create-monaco-overtaking-wurzs-proposals-explained/?fbclid=IwY2xjawKh1HtleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFtdWVlNTlnbXdNV0kya1dmAR5T8YTBZInGQrS57CEink8iw8TXALlauzdT_Z7wvKXNj5L1RoQAcH96QjQ65A_aem_GOqjA8u77csxx8mN9o-raQ

    Three feasible ways to create Monaco overtaking - Wurz's proposals explained May 26, 2025
    by Jon Noble
    4 min read
    7 comments

    Grand Prix Drivers' Association chairman Alex Wurz has outlined three
    feasible ways that Monaco's Formula 1 circuit can be improved to help overtaking.


    ×
    Following another weekend of frustration over the lack of passing opportunities on the Monte Carlo street circuit - accentuated by the controversial team manipulation the situation triggered - there has been renewed talk about the need for potential tweaks to the layout.

    And while the physical limitation of the harbourside venue and buildings
    makes it difficult to see where a major overhaul could happen, former F1
    racer Wurz has outlined three tweaks that could be easily achieved to
    deliver an improvement.


    Wurz's ideas carry some weight because he has huge experience of what is needed for successful race circuits through his track design company
    Wurz Design.

    He is working on the new Qiddiya circuit in Saudi Arabia as well as
    designing a potential F1 venue in Rwanda.

    In a video he posted on Instagram of a presentation of potential Monaco
    track changes, Wurz outlined three areas that could be modified that
    would help maintain the character of the circuit but open up better
    racing and more importantly increase chances for overtaking.

    1 Moving the Nouvelle chicane

    The first area is a revamp of the Nouvelle Chicane after the tunnel.

    Wurz's proposal, which has been discussed with fellow F1 drivers, is to
    extend the tunnel exit and move the chicane further down towards Tabac.

    "I am very convinced, from my own experience watching the races and
    talking to my fellow drivers, that moving the chicane later, which
    physically with the constraints any city has, should be possible," he said.

    "It means the defending for this corner - which is quite easy to do,
    with the kink and the bumps - will become more difficult."

    One of the considerations that would need to be taken into account when working out where the chicane was placed would be ensuring that the
    following Tabac corner was far enough away from the chicane exit that
    drivers still had to lift off for it.

    2 Reprofiling Rascasse

    A simpler change Wurz suggests is to reprofile the Rascasse corner so
    the apex is moved two or three metres further out.

    This can be complemented with a widening of the track, although this has
    to bear in mind a car park ramp that features on the outside of the turn
    and cannot be moved.


    Gary Anderson's idea for a Monaco layout change
    Read more
    Talking about how this improvement could change things, Wurz said: "When
    this apex comes further out, the entry line will definitely change.

    "You will open the corner much more for a divebomb, and that means any
    driver ahead will either have to defend or accept he leaves the door open.

    "If you're defending, you will come out much slower, so you're creating
    a train behind you, and the pressure on all of the drivers will simply increase.

    "I think this is a small trick, quite easy to realise, but should at
    least engage in more fighting, more intense pressure, and perhaps
    overtaking."

    3 The Fairmont hairpin

    The final opportunity that Wurz thinks exists to improve Monaco is to
    widen the entry to the Fairmont (formerly Loews) Hairpin.

    Wurz believes that there is an opportunity to expand the track by just
    more than two metres here at both the entry and exit.

    "It means drivers coming down have an easier opportunity to do a
    divebomb," he said. "It means the lead driver will have to defend more,
    so he will be slower.

    "But the hairpin is very tight, so we need to also enlarge the track on
    the exit, lose the kerb, and have asphalt all the way to this physical
    wall, so we have the turning radius."


    Wurz believes the value of this change is as much in creating overtaking chances for the following corners as at the hairpin itself, because
    defensive lines there will compromise lines and momentum towards the tunnel.

    "The real ideal racing line will not change from what it is…it will just lead into a little bit more defending…and therefore this corner will actually initiate the overtaking into the new chicane," said Wurz.



    "And all that together should be an improvement for the overtaking and raceability in the streets of Monaco."







    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From News@News@Group.Name to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tuesday, May 27, 2025 15:29:20
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 5/27/2025 11:36 AM, a425couple wrote:
    On 5/27/25 01:57, Yazoo wrote:
    On Mon, 26 May 2025 17:02:52 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-05-26 16:46, Geoff wrote:
    Many blamed the 'compulsory 2-stop' rule for disadvantaging cars/teams >>>> stuck behind others doing their own strategies.

    The answer - overtake them, just as you would have to in order to
    gain a
    place without the new rule !

    Yes, not easy at Monaco. but never has been whatever the regs.


    Meh.

    I'm glad they tried something new to spice up a race that has been a
    procession for decades.

    Did it work? No, not really.

    Yeah, mixed feelings.
    Monaco has historical status as "the" race.
    But actual racing has been almost impossible for years now. Cars are
    too big for this narrow streets.
    And nothing can solve this problem.

    Did you see the old car alongside the new one? The old one looks like
    a toy compared to the new one. Current cars are huge, too big for
    these streets of Monaco.

    I agree with the great problems created by modern cars huge size.

    In this article Alexander Wurz discusses 3 feasible solutions.
    (He certainly knows the subject!)

    citation - go to it, to view pictures. https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/three-feasible-ways-to-create-monaco- overtaking-wurzs-proposals-explained/? fbclid=IwY2xjawKh1HtleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFtdWVlNTlnbXdNV0kya1dmAR5T8YTBZInGQrS57CEink8iw8TXALlauzdT_Z7wvKXNj5L1RoQAcH96QjQ65A_aem_GOqjA8u77csxx8mN9o-raQ

    Three feasible ways to create Monaco overtaking - Wurz's proposals
    explained
    May 26, 2025
    by Jon Noble
    4 min read
     7 comments

    Grand Prix Drivers' Association chairman Alex Wurz has outlined three feasible ways that Monaco's Formula 1 circuit can be improved to help overtaking.


    ×
    Following another weekend of frustration over the lack of passing opportunities on the Monte Carlo street circuit - accentuated by the controversial team manipulation the situation triggered - there has been renewed talk about the need for potential tweaks to the layout.

    And while the physical limitation of the harbourside venue and buildings makes it difficult to see where a major overhaul could happen, former F1 racer Wurz has outlined three tweaks that could be easily achieved to deliver an improvement.


    Wurz's ideas carry some weight because he has huge experience of what is needed for successful race circuits through his track design company
    Wurz Design.

    He is working on the new Qiddiya circuit in Saudi Arabia as well as designing a potential F1 venue in Rwanda.

    In a video he posted on Instagram of a presentation of potential Monaco track changes, Wurz outlined three areas that could be modified that
    would help maintain the character of the circuit but open up better
    racing and more importantly increase chances for overtaking.

    1 Moving the Nouvelle chicane

    The first area is a revamp of the Nouvelle Chicane after the tunnel.

    Wurz's proposal, which has been discussed with fellow F1 drivers, is to extend the tunnel exit and move the chicane further down towards Tabac.

    "I am very convinced, from my own experience watching the races and
    talking to my fellow drivers, that moving the chicane later, which physically with the constraints any city has, should be possible," he said.

    "It means the defending for this corner - which is quite easy to do,
    with the kink and the bumps - will become more difficult."

    One of the considerations that would need to be taken into account when working out where the chicane was placed would be ensuring that the following Tabac corner was far enough away from the chicane exit that drivers still had to lift off for it.

    2 Reprofiling Rascasse

    A simpler change Wurz suggests is to reprofile the Rascasse corner so
    the apex is moved two or three metres further out.

    This can be complemented with a widening of the track, although this has
    to bear in mind a car park ramp that features on the outside of the turn
    and cannot be moved.


    Gary Anderson's idea for a Monaco layout change
     Read more
    Talking about how this improvement could change things, Wurz said: "When this apex comes further out, the entry line will definitely change.

    "You will open the corner much more for a divebomb, and that means any driver ahead will either have to defend or accept he leaves the door open.

    "If you're defending, you will come out much slower, so you're creating
    a train behind you, and the pressure on all of the drivers will simply increase.

    "I think this is a small trick, quite easy to realise, but should at
    least engage in more fighting, more intense pressure, and perhaps overtaking."

    3 The Fairmont hairpin

    The final opportunity that Wurz thinks exists to improve Monaco is to
    widen the entry to the Fairmont (formerly Loews) Hairpin.

    Wurz believes that there is an opportunity to expand the track by just
    more than two metres here at both the entry and exit.

    "It means drivers coming down have an easier opportunity to do a
    divebomb," he said. "It means the lead driver will have to defend more,
    so he will be slower.

    "But the hairpin is very tight, so we need to also enlarge the track on
    the exit, lose the kerb, and have asphalt all the way to this physical
    wall, so we have the turning radius."


    Wurz believes the value of this change is as much in creating overtaking chances for the following corners as at the hairpin itself, because defensive lines there will compromise lines and momentum towards the
    tunnel.

    "The real ideal racing line will not change from what it is…it will just lead into a little bit more defending…and therefore this corner will actually initiate the overtaking into the new chicane," said Wurz.



    "And all that together should be an improvement for the overtaking and raceability in the streets of Monaco."








    Ban the barges.
    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From Mark Jackson@mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tuesday, May 27, 2025 15:51:29
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 5/27/2025 3:29 PM, News wrote:
    On 5/27/2025 11:36 AM, a425couple wrote:

    In this article Alexander Wurz discusses 3 feasible solutions.
    (He certainly knows the subject!)

    Ban the barges.

    They'll be a bit narrower and shorter next year, but safety features and
    any meaningful hybrid component both prevent changing to anything close
    to the cars in. . .when was Monaco last a raceable circuit for F1?

    The Wurz proposals seem reasonable on their face; whether they would
    remain so after more investigation (and whether Monaco would be willing
    to carry them out) is unclear.
    --
    Mark Jackson - https://mark-jackson.online/
    Never before has an hour of Presidential rhetoric
    cost so many people so much. - Lawrence Summers
    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tuesday, May 27, 2025 12:56:35
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 2025-05-27 08:36, a425couple wrote:
    On 5/27/25 01:57, Yazoo wrote:
    On Mon, 26 May 2025 17:02:52 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-05-26 16:46, Geoff wrote:
    Many blamed the 'compulsory 2-stop' rule for disadvantaging cars/teams >>>> stuck behind others doing their own strategies.

    The answer - overtake them, just as you would have to in order to
    gain a
    place without the new rule !

    Yes, not easy at Monaco. but never has been whatever the regs.


    Meh.

    I'm glad they tried something new to spice up a race that has been a
    procession for decades.

    Did it work? No, not really.

    Yeah, mixed feelings.
    Monaco has historical status as "the" race.
    But actual racing has been almost impossible for years now. Cars are
    too big for this narrow streets.
    And nothing can solve this problem.

    Did you see the old car alongside the new one? The old one looks like
    a toy compared to the new one. Current cars are huge, too big for
    these streets of Monaco.

    I agree with the great problems created by modern cars huge size.

    In this article Alexander Wurz discusses 3 feasible solutions.
    (He certainly knows the subject!)

    citation - go to it, to view pictures. https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/three-feasible-ways-to-create-monaco- overtaking-wurzs-proposals-explained/? fbclid=IwY2xjawKh1HtleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFtdWVlNTlnbXdNV0kya1dmAR5T8YTBZInGQrS57CEink8iw8TXALlauzdT_Z7wvKXNj5L1RoQAcH96QjQ65A_aem_GOqjA8u77csxx8mN9o-raQ

    If you want to excerpt an article... ...fine.

    But posting it in toto is just poor netiquette.

    Anyway.

    His idea about the Station (sorry...Fairmont) Hairpin is dumb.

    It doesn't help a driver attempting to overtake to force the leading car
    onto a compromised line unless the track AFTER the exit of that corner
    rewards the better exit speed you can achieve by taking the proper
    facing line.

    If you were to modify the station hairpin as Wurz suggests, you're still immediately into Lower Mirabeau, so there's nowhere to go for a car
    behind that exits the hairpin with greater speed.

    I agree with him about the Nouvelle Chicane modification. If that could
    be moved a little later and reshaped so that a driver who defends the
    inside on the first part of the chicane might open up the inside to the overtaking driver in the second half.

    I doubt there's enough change you could make at Rascasse that you'd
    actually generate any overtakes. Drivers would defend the inside and
    there simply isn't room that the car behind could take advantage of his
    better exit speed.
    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From vintageapplemac@vintageapplemac@gmail.com (scole) to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wednesday, May 28, 2025 15:27:29
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    In article <1012vfc$28ek4$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-05-26 16:46, Geoff wrote:
    Many blamed the 'compulsory 2-stop' rule for disadvantaging cars/teams stuck behind others doing their own strategies.

    The answer - overtake them, just as you would have to in order to gain a place without the new rule !

    Yes, not easy at Monaco. but never has been whatever the regs.


    Meh.

    I'm glad they tried something new to spice up a race that has been a procession for decades.

    Did it work? No, not really.

    Yeah, it was a nice idea but didn't pan out. I liked Brundle's suggestion
    he made a couple of times during commentary, that the first stop must be
    taken in first third of race and, iirc, second stop in last third of race, something like that. But, then again, that still wouldn't solve the real problem; the cars are too damn big!

    I did enjoy the race weekend, though. I watched all three practice
    sessions as well as qualy and the race, which I very rarely do, and by the
    end of the race I certainly felt like I'd had my money's worth out of the Monaco GP.
    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wednesday, May 28, 2025 18:21:59
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 2025-05-28 07:27, scole wrote:
    In article <1012vfc$28ek4$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-05-26 16:46, Geoff wrote:
    Many blamed the 'compulsory 2-stop' rule for disadvantaging cars/teams
    stuck behind others doing their own strategies.

    The answer - overtake them, just as you would have to in order to gain a >>> place without the new rule !

    Yes, not easy at Monaco. but never has been whatever the regs.


    Meh.

    I'm glad they tried something new to spice up a race that has been a
    procession for decades.

    Did it work? No, not really.

    Yeah, it was a nice idea but didn't pan out. I liked Brundle's suggestion
    he made a couple of times during commentary, that the first stop must be taken in first third of race and, iirc, second stop in last third of race, something like that. But, then again, that still wouldn't solve the real problem; the cars are too damn big!

    I did enjoy the race weekend, though. I watched all three practice
    sessions as well as qualy and the race, which I very rarely do, and by the end of the race I certainly felt like I'd had my money's worth out of the Monaco GP.

    Pretty much the same for me.

    :-)
    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113