I actually thought a lack of trust in the government was fairly common and normal. There are other things I don't trust the government about, but the
There are other things I don't trust the government about, but the
moon landing isn't one of those things.
enough about this, I did watch a DOC on it ONCE, Yeah, Im sure by now if it was fake somone would of sold the story for millions. I dont know the
If a machine put footprints on the moon, wouldn't it be visible with everything else left behind?
time has passed and they have people like you to white knight for them. the same with the anti-flat earth people. they regurgitate shit they have been told, and many times they are wrong when trying to debunk flat earthers. that's what makes those debates entertaining.
MRO wrote to Nightfox <=-
Re: Re: space is fake?
By: Nightfox to Irish_Monk on Wed Aug 31 2022 08:44 am
It just seems really unlikely to me that they'd keep such a coverup secret for the past 53 years, for such a significant event. I'd think people would have spoken up and called out NASA on it by now if they knew it was covered up (though MRO doesn't agree).
time has passed and they have people like you to white knight for
them. the same with the anti-flat earth people. they regurgitate
shit they have been told, and many times they are wrong when
trying to debunk flat earthers. that's what makes those debates entertaining.
It just seems really unlikely to me that they'd keep such a coverup
secret for the past 53 years, for such a significant event. I'd
think people would have spoken up and called out NASA on it by now
if they knew it was covered up (though MRO doesn't agree).
I think you've been mis-spelling your fake name 'MRO' all this time. It should be 'MOR', which of course is short for 'MORON'. Please make that correction.
If a machine put footprints on the moon, wouldn't it be visible with everything else left behind?
time has passed and they have people like you to white knight for them. the same with the anti-flat earth people. they regurgitate shit they
have been told, and many times they are wrong when trying to debunk flat earthers. that's what makes those debates entertaining.
basically all we have thanks to nasa is some intelligent people pointing out some peculiar occurances and then the sheep defending nasa.
I'm skeptical of the conspiracy mostly because it's a scale that isn't realistic to keep.
For scale, there would have been at *LEAST* 10k people who knew the moon landing was faked... to keep that secret from all of those people for
50+ years is very, very unlikely. There were disclosed illegal black
"Hey Bob, I have an idea. Let's build a robot (before robot technology exists) to deepfake a moon landing by stomping around the surface of the moon. This will be so deep-state that people won't even be able to see the footprints anyway and the only time anyone will see them is the next time in
time has passed and they have people like you to white knight for them. the same with the anti-flat earth people. they regurgitate shit they have been told, and many times they are wrong when trying to debunk flat earthers. that's what makes those debates entertaining.
Dude! ...are you a flat earther?
basically all we have thanks to nasa is some intelligent people pointing out some peculiar occurances and then the sheep defending nasa.
I have several friends that work at NASA Jet Propulsion Lab, I guess they've
been lying to me all this time. Funny, that organization never struck me as sinister.
For scale, there would have been at *LEAST* 10k people who
knew the moon landing was faked... to keep that secret from
all of those people for 50+ years is very, very unlikely.
There were disclosed illegal black sites in europe that far
fewer people knew about that were revealed.
I'm skeptical of the conspiracy mostly because it's a scale
that isn't realistic to keep.
I think you've been mis-spelling your fake name 'MRO' all this time.
it was originally short for MrOblivious
quite fitting.
nasa lies to us everytime they post one of their photoshopped space photos.
I'm skeptical of the conspiracy mostly because it's a scale that isn't realistic to keep.
Which is precisely why I'm skeptical of EVERY conspiracy. I worked in the in
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/11 (Linux/64)
* Origin: m O N T E R E Y b B S . c O M
Ofc if you are an intelliogence contractor, it would be your job to cover conspiracies up, so your word is not worth much in this regard.
Re: Re: space is fake?
By: esc to Tracker1 on Thu Sep 01 2022 11:23 pm
I'm skeptical of the conspiracy mostly because it's a scale that isn't realistic to keep.
Which is precisely why I'm skeptical of EVERY conspiracy. I worked in the in
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/11 (Linux/64)
Ofc if you are an intelliogence contractor, it would be your job to cover conspiracies up, so your word is not worth much in this regard.
Ofc if you are an intelliogence contractor, it would be your job to cover conspiracies up, so your word is not worth much in this regard.
Perhaps in some Hollywood version of what the intelligence community is, sure.
Ofc if you are an intelliogence contractor, it would be your job to cov conspiracies up, so your word is not worth much in this regard.
Perhaps in some Hollywood version of what the intelligence community is, sur
We need no Hollywood. Real life is entertaining enough.
There are human experients whose existence is officially recognized that make the Stanford Prison experiment (you know, the one they had to cancel mid-way because subjetcs were completely losing it under presure) look tame.
Everybody talks about the Nazi's evil experiments but nobody ever talks about the US and Canada being naugthy themselves.
So yup, screw Hollywood. Real life is better. They have not made a good movie in ages anyway.
Mro said to Nightfox: <=-
I actually thought a lack of trust in the government was fairly
normal. There are other things I don't trust the government about,
look at how many people got the vaccine.
Mro said to esc: <=-
Dude! ...are you a flat earther?
i dont really think about it and i dont give a shit either way. it
doesnt affect me at all.
Mro said to esc: <=-
they could have put up a larger version of those wind up feet toys. https://i.imgur.com/njeKEk0.png
Re: space is fake?
By: DaiTengu to MRO on Mon Aug 15 2022 09:05 am
I mean, if space is fake, what are those satellites I'm constantly using and/or communicating through?
What do you use that communicates through satellites?
I mean, if space is fake, what are those satellites I'm constantly
using and/or communicating through?
What do you use that communicates through satellites?
GPS location services seems like an obvious one.
I mean, if space is fake, what are those satellites I'm
constantly using and/or communicating through?
What do you use that communicates through satellites?
GPS location services seems like an obvious one.
True.. For some reason I didn't think of that at the time. I don't often use GPS though (only when I'm going somewhere where I'm not familir with the area, which isn't too often).
mesh network of 5g towers.
I had incredible internet connectivity from an airplane flying over the ocean with no land in site for hours.
that might be 4g because 5g doesn't work that great all the time.or 3G. I Know when I'm in the
that might be 4g because 5g doesn't work that great all the time.or 3G. I Know when I'm in the
Boonies, my phone will drop back to
3G, if I'm really far away from
civilization.
@MSGID: <63733EE0.2910.dove-ent@bbses.info>
@REPLY: <63733A14.50322.dove-ent@vert.synchro.net>
@TZ: 4168
Re: Re: space is fake?
By: John H. Guillory to MRO on Tue Nov 15 2022 12:15 am
that might be 4g because 5g doesn't work that great all the time.or 3G. I Know when I'm in the
Boonies, my phone will drop back to
3G, if I'm really far away from
civilization.
get starlink. the hardware is a bit pricey, though.
| Sysop: | xxorz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Holly Springs, NC |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 11 (0 / 11) |
| Uptime: | 193:39:46 |
| Calls: | 19 |
| Files: | 4,481 |
| Messages: | 619,962 |
